6.21.2009

Housing for Venice


3 unit aggregation

Low water and flooding configurations. In low water, floors rest on pilings. In a flooding situation, monocoques lift off from pilings and float, sliding up and down along mooring posts which direct plumbing and electrical wiring into the ground.

15 unit aggregation

Zcorp print, structural frame with rectangular and round members

6.20.2009

Morphological skips and transitional patterns within gradient environments

Shown here are several experiments conducted with a structural optimization software program (topological optimization based on finite element analysis). In each test case, the locaton of restraints, the magnitude, location and direction of loads, and material properties are specified. A an optimized structure (of minimum volume) is computed, given maximum von Mises stress.  I was interested in creating a gradient environment and then observing how optimal structure evolves along this gradient as a critique of operations of morphing or blending, which I would argue offer an impoverished understanding of transitional mechanisms within complex systems. Above is an environmental gradient from a paradigmatic cantilever condition to catenary condition: from exposure to entirely lateral loads to vertical loads. Note that the optimized structure which develops as one moves between these two paradigmatic conditions is not a simple morphing of extreme shapes, but that there are unexpected jumps or shifts in morphology as one moves across this gradient.

Above (top row): a gradient between an ideal case of exposure to tensile force and to twisting. Bottom row: from lateral force to twisting.

A larger plot of a gradient from vertical to lateral force exposure.

Exposure of a surface to pure tensile force, plot of von Mises stress (far left), optimized structure (second from left), exposure to pure transverse force, von Mises stress plot (second from right) and optimized structure (far right). 

Above, bottom row: The exposure of a surface to a gradient field, from tensile to transverse force. Plot of von Mises stress. Top row: At each extreme, optimized structure under exposure to transverse force (left) and tensile force (right), and the transitional pattern that develops between which is not a simple blend or morph between these extremes. 

A surface exposed to a gradient voiding pattern which shifts from orthagonal to hexagonal in organization and loaded in tension. Left: von Mises stress plot. Right: optimized structure. Note transitional pattern.

Variation of optimized structure of a dome with a distributed vertical load as aperature size varies.

A 3-dimensional elaboration of the first experiment: exposing a structure to a gradient environment from cantilever to catenary condition. A structure supported by piles which wrap around its length,such that it cantilevers at one end and is vertically supported at the other. The structure is optimized to minimize volume based on maximum allowable stress. Blue piles may be removed from the optimized structure. The result is not a gradient pattern of pilings from the cantilevering to the vertically supported end. Gradient environmental conditions thus do not result in gradient (ie smoothly morphing) structures.

6.18.2009

Bibliography


Alberini, Anna, Paolo Rosato and Margherita Turvani, eds. Valuing Complex Natural Resource Systems: The Case of the Lagoon of Venice. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.
Bach, Klaus and Berthold Burkhardt, ed. Diatomeen I: Schalen in Natur und Technik. IL. Universität Stuttgart. Institut für Leichte Flächentragwerke. 28. March 1984.
Baldock, Robert and Dr. Kristina Shea. Structural Systems Optimization for the Building Industry. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Engineering Design Centre. Nov. 2005.
Balmond, Cecil. Informal. Munich: Prestel, c2002.
Bechthold, Martin. Innovative surface structures: technologies and applications. New York Taylor & Francis, 2008.
Bendsøe, M.P. Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark and A. R. Diaz S. Chellappa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, Design Optimization in a Multiscale Setting.
Bergson, Henri. Time and free will: an essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications, 2001.
Bernard, Trevisan. Della Laguna Di Venezia. Sala Bolognese: A. Forni, 1988.
Bernstein, Fred A. Intricacy. Architectural record, 2003 May, vol.191, no.5, pp.117-118.
Bettum, Johan. Skin deep: polymer composite materials in architecture. Architectural design, Jan. 2002, vol..72, no.1, pp.[72]-76.
Billington, David. Thin shell concrete structures. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1982.
Bollinger, Klaus, Manfred Grohmann, and Oliver Tessman. Form, Force, Performance: Multi-Parametric Structural Design.
Architectural Design, vol.. 78, no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 20-25.
Bremicker, M. M. Chirehdast, N. Kikuchi, and P.Y. Papalambros. Integrated Topology and Shape Optimization in Structural Design.
Mechanical Structure and Machining vol.. 19, no. 4, 1991, pp. 551-587.
Brookes, Alan Jeremy. Moulding architecture. Architects’ journal vol. 208, no. 9, Sept.10, 1998: pp. 60-61.
Brunot, Vincent. La Lagune De Venise. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.
Cacciavillani, Ivone. Le Leggi Veneziane Sul Territorio, 1471-1789: Boschi, Fiumi, Bonifiche e Irrigazioni. Vol. 1. Limena, Padova: Signum, 1984.
Campos, Cristian, ed. Plastic design. Köln: Daab, c2007.
Canetti, Elias. Crowds and power. Farrar Straus Giroux, 1988.
Castle, H. Emergence in architecture, AA files, 2004, no. 50, pp. 50-61.
Chandler, Ahrens, et al. The Hylomorphic Project. Proposal for the GenHome Project, MAK Center, Los Angeles, 2006.
Chu, Karl. Metaphysics of Genetic Architecture and Computation. Architectural Design vol.. 76 no. 4, July/August 2006, pp. 38-45.
Computer aided Architectural Design Futures 2007 : Proceedings on the 12th International CAADFutures. International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures (12). Sydney: 2007.
Concina, Ennio. La Città Degli Ebrei: Il Ghetto Di Venezia: Architettura e Urbanistica. Venezia : Albrizzi, 1991.
Consorzio Venezia nuova, ed. Quaderni Trimestrali. Venezia: Il Consorzio.
Convegno Laguna, fiumi, lidi, cinque secoli di gestione delle acque (1983: Fondazione,Giorgio Cini. Laguna, Fiumi, Lidi : Cinque Secoli Di Gestione Delle Acque Nelle Venezie: Atti Del Convegno Indetto Dal Magistrato Alle Acque, Venezia-Fondazione Cini, S. Giorgio Maggiore, 10-12 Giugno 1983. Venice: La Press, 1985.
Crary, Jonathan and Sanford Kwinter, eds. Incorporations. New York, NY : Zone ; [Cambridge, Mass.] : Distributed by the MIT Press, c1992.
DeLanda, Manuel. Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London ; New York : Continuum, 2002.
DeLanda, Manuel. A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York : Zone Books ; Distributed by MIT Press, 1997.
DeLanda, Manuel. 2002. Deleuze and the use of the genetic algorithm in architecture. Architectural design, Jan., vol..72, no.1, pp. 9-12.
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and repetition. New York : Columbia University Press, 1994.
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia; translation and foreword by Brian Massumi. London: Athlone Press, 1988.
Deleuze, Gilles. Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books, 1991.
Dickson, M. Frei Otto: researcher, inventor and inspired instigator of architectural solutions, AA files, 2004, no. 50, pp. 36-49.
Digital architecture and construction. International Conference on Digital Architecture and Construction (1). Seoul, Korea, 2006.
Dolcetta, Bruno and Sandro Antinori, eds. P.A.L.A.V. Piano Di Area Della Laguna e Dell’Area Veneziana, Caselle di Sommacampagna (Verona); Venezia: Cierre; Regione Veneto, 1999.
Drew, Philip. Frei Otto: Form and structure. London: Crosby Lockwood Staples, 1976.
Duan, M. An efficient hybrid / mixed element for geometrically nonlinear analysis of plate and shell structures. Comput Mech (2004) 35: pp. 72–84 Published online: 11 August 2004 Springer-Verlag.
Ednie-Brown, Pia and Alisa Andrasek. Continuum: A Self-Engineering Creature-Culture. Architectural Design vol.. 76, no. 5, September/October 2006, pp. 18-25.
Ednie-Brown, Pia. Over-All: biothing and Emergent Composition. Architectural Design, Vol. 76, No 4, July/August 2006, pp.72-81.
Favero, Vito, Riccardo Parolini and Mario Scattolin, eds. Morfologia Storica Della Laguna Di Venezia, Vol. 3. Venezia: Arsenale, 1988.
Field, Caroline. Simulation of full-scale seismic-resistant structural frame tests using LS-DYNA 960 Implicit Solver. Ove Arup & Partners, California Ltd. www.arup.com.
Haeckel, Ernst. Kunstformen der Natur; mit Beiträgen von Olaf Breidbach, Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt und Richard P. Hartmann. München ; New York : Prestel, c1998.
Fletcher, Caroline and T. Spencer, eds. Flooding and Environmental Challenges for Venice and its Lagoon: State of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Fletcher, Caroline. The Science of Saving Venice. Torino: Umberto Allemandi, 2004.
Frassetto, Roberto, ed. International Centre Cities on water, Meeting 1989. Impact of Sea Level Rise on Cities and Regions : Proceedings of the First International Meeting “Cities on Water”, Venice, December 11- 13, 1989. Venice: Marsilio Editori, 1991.
Ghetti, A. Subsidence and Sea-Level Fluctuations in the Territory of Venice. Landscape & Urban Planning 16, no. 1 (10, 1988): pp. 13-33.
Goy, Richard J. Venetian Vernacular Architecture: Traditional Housing in the Venetian Lagoon. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Haan, Hilde de. De Deltawerken : Techniek, Politiek, Achtergronden. Delft: Waltman, 1984.
Haeckel, Ernst. Generelle morphologie der organismen: allgemeine grundzüge der organischen formen-wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte descendenztheorie. Reprint. Originally published : Berlin : G. Reimer, 1866. Berlin ; New York: De Gruyter, 1988.
Hensel, M. (Synthetic) life architectures: ramifications and potentials of a literal biological paradigm for architectural design, Architectural design, 2006, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 18-25.
Hensel, M. Computing self-organisation: environmentally sensitive growth modelling, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, 2006, pp. 12-17.
Hensel, M. Towards self-organisational and multiple-performance capacity in architecture, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, 2006, pp. 5-17.
Hensel, Michael, Defne Sunguroglu and Achim Menges. Material Performance, Architectural design vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 34-41.
Hensel, M. Finding exotic form: an evolution of form finding as a design method, Architectural design, vol.. 74, no. 3, 2004, pp. 26-33.
Hensel, Michael. Performance-Orientated Design Precursors and Potentials, Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 48-53.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Inclusive Performance: Efficiency Versus Effectiveness Towards a Morpho-Ecological Approach for Design, Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 54-63.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Membrane Spaces, Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 74-79.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Differentiation and performance: multi-performance architectures and modulated environments, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 60-69.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Material and digital design synthesis: integrating material self-organisation, digital morphogenesis, associative parametric modelling and computer-aided manufacturing, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 88-95.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Designing Morpho-Ecologies: Versatility and Vicissitude of Heterogeneous Space, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 102-111.
Hensel, Michael and Achim Menges. Versatility and Vicissitude: An Introduction to Performance in Morpho-Ecological Design. Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 6-11.
Hensel, M., M. Weinstock, M. and A. Menges, A. Emergence in architecture: the Emergence and Design Group, Architectural design, vol.. 74, no. 3, 2004, pp. 6-9.
Hinton, E. Analysis and optimization of prismatic and axisymmetric shell structures : theory, practice, and software. London: Springer, 2003.
Husserl, Edmund. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.
Istituto veneto di scienze,lettere ed arti, ed. La Ricerca Scientifica Per Venezia: Il Progetto Sistema Lagunare Veneziano, Venezia: Istituto veneziano di scienze lettere ed arti, 2000.
Islami, Yahaya. Significance and surface-play in architecture. Scroope: Cambridge architectural journal vol..18, June 2006: pp. 144-151.
Jaeschke, Aleksandra. Environmental Intensifiers. Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 88-95.
Jeronimidis, G. Biodynamics, Architectural design, 2004, vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 92-95.
Joedicke, Jürgen. Shell architecture. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1963.
Johnson, Philip and Mark Wigley. Deconstructivist architecture. New York : Museum of Modern Art ; Boston: Distributed by New York Graphic Society Books, Little Brown and Co., c1988.
Johnson, Steven. Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner, c2001.
Katz, David. Gestalt Psychology: Its Nature and Significance. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1950.
Kelly, Kevin, Out of control: the new biology of machines, social systems, and the economic world. Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books, c1994.
Kipnis, Jeffrey. Towards a new architecture. Architectural design, Mar.-Apr. 1993, vol..63, no.3-4, pp.[40]-49.
Kolatan, Sulan. Lumping. Architectural design, Jan. 2002., vol.72, n.1, pp.77-83.
Koolhaas, Rem and Bruce Mao. S,M,L,XL. New York, The Monacelli Press, 1995.
Kwinter, Sanford. Landscapes of change: Boccioni’s ‘Stati d’animo’ as a general theory of models. Assemblage, Dec. 1992, no.19, pp.[50]-65.
Kwinter, Sanford. Soft Systems, in Boigon, Brian, ed. Culture Lab 1. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1993.
Kwinter, Sanford. Architecture and the Technologies of Life. AA Files. Summer 1994, no. 27, pp. 3-4.
Kwinter, Sanford. Confessions of an Organicist. Log. Spring/Summer 2005, no. 5, pp. 71-75.
Lasserre, Pierre and Angelo Marzollo, eds. The Venice Lagoon Ecosystem: Inputs and Interactions between Land and Sea, Vol. 25. Paris; New York: UNESCO; Parthenon Pub. Group, 2000.
Leach, Neil. Digital morphogenesis: a new paradigmatic shift in architecture, Archithese, 2006, vol.. 36, no. 4, pp. 44-49.
Leach, Neil, ed. Designing for a Digital World. London: Wiley-Academy, 2002.
Leach, Neil, David Turnbull, Chris Williams, eds. Digital tectonics. Chichester, U.K.; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy, 2004.
Leuppi, Judith and Kristina Shea. The Hylomorphic Project. The ARUP Journal. 1/2008, pp. 28-30.
Lewis, W. J. Tension Structures: Form and behaviour. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 2003.
Lorenzetti, Giulio, Venice and its Lagoon. Roma: Istituto poligrafico dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato, 1961.
Luebkeman, Chris and Kristina Shea. CDO: Computational design + optimization in building practice. The ARUP Journal, 3/2005, pp.17- 21.
Lynn, Greg. Folds, bodies & blobs: collected essays. Bruxelles: La Lettre volée, 1998.
Lynn, Greg. Animate form. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1999.
Lynn, Greg. Greg Lynn: Embryologic Houses. Architectural design, 2000 June, vol..70, no.3, pp.[26]-35.
Lynn, Greg. Shoei Yoh: de la naturaleza a un nuevo vitalismo = From nature to a new vitalism. Quaderns d’arquitectura i urbanisme, 1998, no.220, pp.[122]-[129].
Lynn, Greg. Shoei Yoh: Prefectura Gymnasium. Architectural design, 1993 Mar.-Apr., vol..63, no.3-4, pp.[78]-81.
Lynn, Greg. Dynamic space. Architecture d’aujourd’hui, 2003 Nov.-Dec., no. 349, pp.104-109.
Mattheck, Claus. The body language of trees: a handbook for failure analysis. London: The Stationery Office, c1997, c1994.
Mattheck, Claus. Design in nature: learning from trees. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
Melarango, Michele. An introduction to shell structures: The art and science of vaulting. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1991.
Menges, A. Polymorphism, Architectural design, 2006, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 78-87.
Menges, A. Instrumental geometry. Architectural design, 2006. vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 42-53.
Menges, A. Morpho-ecologies: approaching complex environments, Architectural design, 2004, vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 80-89.
Menges, A. Manufacturing Performance, Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 42-47.
Menges, A. Manufacturing diversity. Architectural design, 2006. vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 70-77.
Menges, A. Michael Hensel; Frei Otto. Architectural design, 2006. vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 78-87.
Morel, Philippe. Computatonal Intelligence: The Grid as a Post-Human Network. Architectural design. vol.. 76, no. 5, September/October 2006, pp. 100-103.
Nixon, David, and Jan Kaplicky. Skin: Monocoque and semi-monocoque structures. Architectural review. vol.. 174, no.1037, July 1983. pp. 54-59.
Ohsaki, M. and N. Katoh. Topology optimization of trusses with stress and local constraints on nodal stability and memberintersection. Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University.
O’Reilly, U., Hemberg, M. & Menges, A. Evolutionary computation and artificial life in architecture: exploring the potential of generative and genetic algorithms as operative design tools, Architectural design, 2004, vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 48-53.
Otto, Frei, and Emergence and Design Group. Frei Otto in conversation with the Emergence and Design Group, Architectural design, 2004, vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 18-25.
Otto, Frei. Pneu und Knochen. IL. Universität Stuttgart. Institut für Leichte Flächentragwerke. vol.. 35, October 1995.
Patteeuw, Véronique, ed. Architectural laboratories / Greg Lynn and Hani Rashid. Rotterdam: NAi ; New York, NY: Available in North, South and Central America through D.A.P., Distributed Art Pubs., 2002.
Pavanini, Mario. Traditional house construction. In issue “Venice: Problems and Possibilities.” Architectural Review 149, (05, 1971).
Payne, Andrew. Surfacing the new sensorium. Praxis: journal of writing + building. vol.. 9, 2007, pp. 5-13.
Pedreschi, Remo. Form, Force and Structure: A Brief History. Architectural design. vol.. 78, no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 12-19.
Peerdeman, Bart. Analysis of Thin Concrete Shells Revisited: Opportunities due to Innovations in Materials and Analysis Methods. Master’s thesis, University of Delft, Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Structural and Building Engineering, Delft, June 2008.
Petit, Emmanuel. Botox-ing architecture’s hermeneutical wrinkles: from differential to integrative thinking in architecture, 1965-2005. Perspecta, 2006, no.38, pp.[28]-[39].
Prinja, N. K. An introduction to the use of material models in FE. NAFEMS Ltd, 2005.
Rahim, Ali. Surface continuity, an elegant integration: Greg Lynn. Architectural design, 2007 Jan.-Feb., vol..77, no.1, pp.38-43.
Ramm, Ekkehard et al. Structural Optimization. Current and emerging technologies of shell and spatial structures: Proceedings of the Colloquium. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures: 1998.
Rocker, Ingeborg/Studio Rocker. Re-coded; 9 researches, Berlin : Aedes East, 2005.
Rocker, Ingeborg. Calculus-based form: an interview with Greg Lynn. Architectural design, 2006 July-Aug., vol..76, no.4, pp.[88]-95.
Roe, S. What a brick wants to become: a design-research project, AA files, 2006, no. 53, pp. 8-13.
Romanelli, Giandomenico. Venezia Ottocento: L’Architettura, l’Urbanistica. Venezia: Albrizzi, 1988.
Shodek, Daniel, Martin Bechthold, et al. Digital Design and Manufacturing: CAD/CAM Applications in Architecture and Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2005.
Serres, Michel. The Parasite. Baltimore, 1982.
Shea, Kristina. Creating synthesis partners. Architectural design, Jan. 2002, vol.. 72, no. 1, pp. [42]-45.
Shirdel, Bahram. Bahram Shirdel: Nara Convention Hall. Architectural design, 1993 Mar.-Apr., vol.. 63, no.3-4. p.[50-53].
Shirdel, Bahram. Bahram Shirdel: Scottish National Heritage, a living museum. Architectural design, 1993 Mar.-Apr., vol.. 63, no. 3-4, pp.[54]-55.
Silver, Mike. Codes, Eros and Craft: An Interview with Evan Douglis. Architectural design. vol.. 76, no. 4, July/August 2006, pp. 62-71.
Taylor, Mark. Introduction: [surface consciousness]. Architectural design. vol.. 73, no. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2003, pp. 5-7.
Testa, Peter and Devyn Weiser. Emergent structural morphology. Architectural design. Jan. 2002, vol..72, no.1, pp. 13-16.
Testa, Peter and Devyn Weiser. Generative form language. Scroope: Cambridge architecture journal, 2000, no. 12, pp. 26-29.
Thom, Rene. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Reading, Mass.: W. A. Benjamin, 1975.
Thompson, D’Arcy Wentworth. On growth and form. New York: Dover, 1992.
Trummer, Peter. Engineering Ecologies. Architectural design, vol.. 78 no. 2, March/April 2008, pp. 96-101.
Tiepolo, Maria Francesca, Franco Rossi and Istituto veneto di scienze,lettere ed arti, eds. Convegno di studio Il governo,delle acque. Il Governo Delle Acque, Venezia: Istituto veneto di scienze, lettere ed arti, 2008.
Trincanato, Egle Renata. The humble Venetian house. In issue: “Venice: Problems and Possibilities.” Architectural Review 149, (05, 1971).
van Uffelen, Chris, ed. Pure plastic: new materials for today’s architecture. Berlin: Braun, 2008.
Visotto, Sergio, ed. Il Territorio Altinate e Le Sue Acque: Aspetti Idrogeologici, Vegetazionali, Ornitologici e Di Trattamento Fisico-Chimico-Bioogico Delle Acque Dell’Ecosistema Altinate, Venezia: Edizione A.S.T.E.A, 1998.
Walker, C. & Emergence and Design Group. Engineering design: working with advanced geometries, Metropolis, 2004, vol.. 23, no. 10, pp. 64-71.
Weinstock, M. Self-organisation and material constructions, Architectural design, 2006, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 34-41.
Weinstock, M. Self-organisation and the structural dynamics of plants, Architectural design, 2006, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 26-33.
Weinstock, M. Morphogenesis and the mathematics of emergence, Architectural design, 2004, vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 10-17.
Weinstock, M. Metabolism and Morphology. Architectural design, March/April 2008, vol.. 78, no. 2, pp. 26-33.
Weinstock, Michael, Achim Menges, and Michael Hensel. Fit fabric: Versatility through redundancy and differentiation. Architectural design. 2004. vol.. 74, no. 3, pp. 40-47.
Weinstock, Michael and Nikolaos Stathopoulos. Advanced simulation in design. Architectural design, 2006, vol.. 76, no. 2, pp. 54-59.
Wolfram, Stephen. How do simple programs behave? Architectural design, July/August 2006, vol.. 76, no. 4, pp. 34-37.
Xie, Y.M., X. Huang, J.W. Tang and P. Felicetti. Recent Advances in Evolutionary Structural Optimization. Keynote Lecture for Frontiers of Computational Science Symposium, Nagoya University, Japan, 11-13 October 2005.
Yamazaki, Koetsu, Ryouiti Itoh, Jing Han, Masato Watanabe, and Sadao Nishiyama. Optimum Design of Aluminum Beverage Can Ends Using Structural Optimization Techniques. American Institute of Physics, 2005.
Yoh, Shoei. Shoei Yoh: in response to natural phenomena, text by Anthony Iannacci; introductions by Kisho Kurokawa [et al.]. Milano: L’Arca, 1997.
Zanetti, Michele, ed. La Laguna Di Venezia: Ambiente, Naturalità, Uomo, Venice (Italy: Province). Assessorato alle politiche ambientali. Vol. 4. Portogruaro (Venezia): Nuova dimensione, 2007.
Zendrini, Bernardino. Memorie Storiche Dello Stato Antico e Moderno Delle Lagune Di Venezia, Vol. 19. Sala Bolognese: A. Forni, 1998.
Zucchetta, Gianpietro. Storia Dell’Acqua Alta a Venezia: Dal Medioevo all’Ottocento. Venezia: Marsilio, 2000.

Image Credits

Figure 1,2, 5-10. Greg Lynn, Folds, bodies & blobs: collected essays, 1998.
Figure 3, 20. Greg Lynn, Shoei Yoh: From nature to a new vitalism. Quaderns d’arquitectura i urbanisme, no.220, 1998.
Figure 4. Bahram Shirdel, Bahram Shirdel: Nara Convention Hall. Architectural design, vol.. 63, no.3-4, 1993.
Figure 11. S. Lehar, The World In Your Head, 2003.
Figure 12. Greg Lynn, Greg Lynn: Embryologic Houses. Architectural design, vol..70, no.3, 2000.
Figure 13. Ingeborg Rocker, Calculus-based form: an interview with Greg Lynn, Architectural design, vol..76, no.4, 2006.
Figure 14. Bahram Shirdel, Bahram Shirdel: Scottish National Heritage, a living museum, Architectural design, vol..63, no.3-4, 1993.
Figure 15. Jeffrey Kipnis, Towards a new architecture, Architectural design, vol..63, no.3-4, 1993.
Figure 16, 18, 19. Sanford Kwinter, Landscapes of change: Boccioni’s ‘Stati d’animo’ as a general theory of models. Assemblage, no.19, 1992.
Figure 17. Rene Thom, Structural Stability and Morphogenesis, 1975.
Figure 21, 22. Shoei Yoh, Shoei Yoh: in response to natural phenomena, 1997.
Figure 23-26. Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mao, S,M,L,XL, (New York, 1995). Figure 26 drawn by Cecil Balmond.
Figure 27. Cecil Balmond, Informal, 2002.
Figure 28-35. Klaus Bach and Berthold Burkhardt, ed. Diatomeen I: Schalen in Natur und Technik, IL no. 28, 1984.
Figure 36-38. Karl Chu, Metaphysics of Genetic Architecture and Computation, Architectural Design, vol.. 76 no. 4, 2006.
Figure 39-41. Pia Ednie-Brown, Over-All: biothing and Emergent Composition, Architectural Design, vol.. 76, no. 4, 2006.
Figure 42, 44. Michael Hensel and Achim Menges, Designing Morpho-Ecologies, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, 2006.
Figure 43. Michael Weinstock, Metabolism and Morphology, Architectural design, vol.. 76, no. 2, 2006.
Figure 45,46. Michael Hensel and Achim Menges, Morpho-ecologies, 2006.
Figures 47-54, 61-76. Claus Mattheck, Design in nature: learning from trees, 1998.
Figures 55-58. Mike Xie and Grant Steven, Innovative Structures Group, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, www.isg.rmit.edu.au/research_ESO.html
Figure 59. Forty Towers GT40Club.com, www.gt40club.com/kvaphotos.htm, accessed 1/2009.
Figure 60. I-Car Advantage Online, http://www.i-car.com/html_pages/technical_information/advantage/advantage online_archives/2008/051908.shtml, accessed 1/2009.
Figures 77-80. Martin Bechthold, Innovative surface structures: technologies and applications, 2008.
Figures 81-82. Arata Isozaki, Arata Isozaki. GA Document.
Figures 83-85. Ramm, Ekkehard et al. Structural Optimization. in Current and emerging technologies of shell and spatial structures: Proceedings of the Colloquium. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures: 1998.
Figures 86-95. M.P. Bendsøe, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark and A. R. Diaz S. Chellappa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, Design Optimization in a Multiscale Setting.
Figures 97-101. Jürgen Joedicke, Shell architecture, 1963.
102. www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/BSI/SPACEFRAME/spaceframe.html, accessed 1/2009.
Figure 103. Concina, Ennio. La Città Degli Ebrei: Il Ghetto Di Venezia: Architettura e Urbanistica. Venezia : Albrizzi, 1991.
Figure 104. Istituto veneto di scienze,lettere ed arti, ed. La Ricerca Scientifica Per Venezia: Il Progetto Sistema Lagunare Veneziano, Venezia: Istituto veneziano di scienze lettere ed arti, 2000. 
Figure 105. Romanelli, Giandomenico. Venezia Ottocento: L’Architettura, l’Urbanistica. Venezia: Albrizzi, 1988.
Figure 106. Pavanini, Mario. Traditional house construction. In issue “Venice: Problems and Possibilities.” Architectural Review 149, (05, 1971).
Figure 107. Goy, Richard. The House of Gold: building a palace in medieval Venice. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Figures 108-110: Istituto veneto di scienze,lettere ed arti, ed. La Ricerca Scientifica Per Venezia: Il Progetto Sistema Lagunare Veneziano, Venezia: Istituto veneziano di scienze lettere ed arti, 2000. 
Figures 111-114. Goy, Richard. The House of Gold: building a palace in medieval Venice. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Figure 118: Fletcher, Caroline. The Science of Saving Venice. Torino: Umberto Allemandi, 2004. 
Figure 119-122: Istituto veneto di scienze,lettere ed arti, ed. La Ricerca Scientifica Per Venezia: Il Progetto Sistema Lagunare Veneziano, Venezia: Istituto veneziano di scienze lettere ed arti, 2000. 
Figure 123: Dura Vermeer, www.duravermeer.nl


Chapter 6: Venice: Climatic variability, local construction methods

Figure 118: Flooding at + 8 cm above sea level (light blue) and at + 10 cm (dark blue.)

Venice is a city of dramatic variability of environmental conditions, both tidal and topographical. The architecture of Venice has developed in response to these environmental contingencies. Piles allow construction on earth with low bearing capacity, as do lighter Venetian bricks, 2 inches thinner than Roman brick, and special Venetian techniques of light roof construction. The traditional Venetian house is composed of two or three bays, the narrow width of these bays limited to a few standard dimensions by the low carrying capacity of the sandy or silty soil beneath. Light brick walls were protected from moisture erosion with a facing of marble reaching just above the highest expected tide level at time of construction. 

Figures 108-110:  Typical wall sections of canal and residence. In blue, the highest expected water level at time of construction as evidenced by the height of the marble facing.

Figure 105: 18th century design proposal for Venetian abbatoir, note highly specific program and soil contingent arrangement of foundation piles.

Figures 111-114: Ca’ d’Oro: a typical 2 bay residence. Facade; plan of ground floor and levels 1 and 2.

Figure 107: Ca’ d’Oro: section showing thin, closely spaced floor beams typical of traditional Venetian residential construction.

Figure 106, 107: Typical Venetian residential roof construction, note thin purlins and plaster cieling to reduce weight of structure.

Figure 103: Map of Venice, 1346. Settlement of Venice began on areas of soil of high bearing capacity. Architecture built at this time utilized conventional foundations. By the end of the 14th century, settlement advanced over soils with poor bearing capacity, and from this time on, pile or raft foundations were utilized.

Figure 104: Soil types, Venice lagoon

The existing architecture of Venice has reached a limit condition wherein strategies utilized to manage environmental variability can no longer effectively accomodate the increasing rate of change brought on by global warming. Lagoon water now routinely rises above the marble facing protecting building and canal walls, causing bricks to erode. Piazza San Marco has been repaved, stacking layer upon layer, as sea levels rise, but now paving has been installed at a level where it has begun to interfere with the thresholds of Saint Mark's. The paving cannot be raised again, yet the piazza is flooded an ever increasing number of days each year.

Figure 120: Erosion and sedimentation patterns in Venice lagoon. Erosion is occuring at an ever increasing rate each year.

Figure 119: Remaining stands of sea grass, Venice lagoon. Poisioning of sea grass by industrial pollutants has increased the rate of erosion.

Top left to bottom right: Flooding pattern at current sea level, at +1 M, +2 M, and +3M. Greater Venice is located on an enormous flood plane which could become entirely submerged if the polar icecaps continue to melt.

Figure 122: MOSES flood gate. The MOSES rests at the bottom of the ocean near the lagoon inlet and is raised pneumatically during high tides. It is estimated that within 25 years, it will be raised so many days per year that it will interfere with the natural tidal flushing of the lagoon, allowing a dangerous level of bacteria and pollutants to concentrate in the canals.

Figure 121: Current velocity at lagoon inlet. The reconfiguring of the inlets of the Venice lagoon have increased the current velocity, thus increasing rates of erosion.

Figures 115-117: Flooding in Venice

Chapter 5: The monocoque and multiplicity, Structural patterning, Multi-scale optimization


Principle lines of stress created by loading a vault with internal beams and columns

Figures 99-101. Theodor Teichen, Market Hall
Placement of reinforcing along lines of tensile stress. Plan, Detail section of reinforcing.


Research Proposal
This thesis is a reconsideration of concepts of openness, integration, and multiplicity within architecture. Recognizing that contemporary algorithmic and morphogenetic architectural projects which seek to critique modernist modularity fail to offer a compelling alternative vision of integration which does not rely on reduction and homogenization to foster coherence, this project seeks to integrate elements which fundamentally differ in kind, exploring such phenomena as the catastrophe and phase shift as mechanisms which bridge between singularities which produce fundamentally different qualities, behaviors, patterns and protocols. The project seeks an alternative both to building systems based on standardized building components and those based on a single building component which is varied to produce a rhetorical parametricism (unable to productively respond to multiple independent environmental variables, and thus ultimately nothing more than an aesthetic of self-similarity). The closed self-consistent organism based either on compulsive repetition of standardized modules, or on a formally driven production of self-similar components is to be countered through the insertion of foreign codes (patterns, logics, protocols which regulate parts-to-whole relations) into an architectural body, building new potentials, competencies, and affiliations with systems outside of its interior.

Flow of principle lines of stress on a surface around two holes, tensile loading.


Interrogating the Singularity of the Monocoque
A new interest in material elegance, achieved via the resolution of multiple performative requirements within a single coherent formal system, as well as an interest in appropriating versioning(108) techniques and technologies used in the automotive industry has made the monocoque an increasing popular focus of architectural research. The monocoque integrates surface and structure, ergonomics and aerodynamics. A closer study of the automotive monocoque, however-- to its joints, material transitions, and pragmatic hybridizations, reveals that the constructed monocoque is never simply a realization of monocoque as pure concept: a singular continuous totalizing system. In practice, the monocoque is composed of various materials with different performative capabilities, each with their own logic of assembly and local densities (fiberglass strands within resin for instance), is often, for ease of production, designed as multiple assembled parts, and often feature non-surface based structural elements which make the monocoque more a hybrid than pure type. Conceptually an absolute or limit condition, a closed body, a singular totality and yet in practice a malleable type-- the monocoque may be used as a vehicle to explore the limits of openness and diversity within a coherent architectural body. By forcing the monocoque to incorporate multiple material and connective logics based on local conditions and requirements, one may test the limits of its coherence and determine the moments when the monocoque dissolves, divides, or multiplies into something beyond itself.

Figure 59. KVA monocoque frame hybrid chassis

Figure 60. The Jaguar XK monocoque
Red: cast aluminum
Blue: extruded aluminum
White: stamped aluminum
Sections joined by welding and blind rivets

Geometric versus structural patterning
To the left is a geometric tesselation which attempts to maximize difference within a continuous field: difference of size and placement of apertures, density, and base geometry. Geometry is a closed system, depending upon its own internal logics for consistency and rigor. To the right are five figures generated by structural analysis and optimization software. A rectangular angle bracket with three holes develops different stresses in each case according to the different applied loads and restraints. The shape of the angle bracket is optimized in each case to minimize stresses, given maximum mass. Unlike geometrical patterns, structural figures and patterns are open bodies, contingent upon external conditions and forces.

Figure 61-76, C. Mattheck.
Column 1 (left): Design space, loads and restraints.
Column 2 (middle): von Mises stress
Column 3 (right) Design proposal
Row 1 (top): Tensile loading
Row 2: Twisting
Row 3: Shear loading
Row 4: Transverse loading
Row 5: Transverse loading, moment connections

Topological optimization algorithms input various environmental contingencies (support/restraint conditions, forces, specific material properties, clearance zones within the design domain which must be free of material, maximum deflection and typically the maximum allowable mass of the part/body to be designed). Goals are typically to minimize stress, or maximize stiffness. These algorithms, therefore allow an interaction between external logics (nature of restraints, position and size of loads, etc) and internal logics (material behaviors due to elasticity, plasticity, isotropic or non-isotropic composition, etc.)

Figure 81,82. Arata Isozaki, Automobile Museum
Above: Increasingly refined iterations (stresses progressively decreased) created through a topological optimization algorithm.
Below: Sections, elevation

Arata Isozaki’s Automobile Museum is one of the few architectural projects which utilizes topology optimization. Its topologically optimized roof and supports are developed as a monolithic body subject to generalized forces. (See Mike Xie’s very similar bridge structures below, which utilize the same ESO algorithm and are based upon a simple design scenario: 4 supports and an equally distributed load.) A structure which is subject to varied local loading conditions, rather than a generic distributed load, would be more highly differentiated. In addition, a field of linked components, rather than a monolithic structure, would create a finer grain of resolution, more clearly registering the effects of local stress gradients. This thesis will explore the creation of pattern, which, like the above geometric tesselation, is a highly differentiated, yet continuous field of modules, and a fusion of different regimes with different rules and behaviors, but unlike the geometric pattern, informed by material and environmental conditions.

Figures 90-95, M.P. Bendsøe.
Objective: Find optimal arrangement of tiles to minimize the weight of the structure while retaining sufficient structural stiffness.
Given: Four tiles of varying material density.
Top left to bottom right:
1. Four tiles available to build structure
2. Design space, loads and restraints
3. Topology optimization result
4. Magnification of result

Multi-scale optimization
Bendsøe, Diaz, and Chellappa have worked on the problem of introducing multi-scale modularity into a topological optimization algorithm.(109) They introduce a finite number of modules which vary in density/mass into an optimization algorithm. Predetermining the arrangement of mass within the module and limiting the number of different variables creates a compromise between optimization and standardization. It creates a microscale weave which anticipates fabrication to a greater extent than monolithic optimization solutions, breaking it into assemblable components, but does not allow optimization to inform/deform this microstructure. This thesis will seek to design an architecture that achieves optimization at both the scale of the global and at the scale of the component/microweave.

Figures 86-89, M.P. Bendsøe.
Objective: To find optimal arrangement of perforated modules to minimize the weight of the structure while retaining sufficient structural stiffness.
Given: A finite collection of modules with varying perforation radii
Top light to bottom right:
1. Design space, loads and restraints
2. Conventional topology optimization result.
3, 4. Results using perforated modules, varying allowable radii range.


Seeding a field with multiple logics
This thesis will develop multiple unique localities which will together constitute an environment for the development of structure. These may include ground conditions allowing edge support and those requiring point supports, a locality required to channel water for drainage purposes, localities in which a structural interruption/discontinuity is required, a locality characterized by the necessity for cantilevering structure, a locality requiring minimal shell curvature, and thus evolving a structure which carries loads primarily in bending, a locality in which structure is required to bifurcate to partition space, a locality in which a space which is shaded, yet open to the air is desirable, necessitating the use of tension structures, localities subject to high levels of torque and areas subject to large shear stress. Unique components and connective protocols will be developed for each locality. Research will also be directed towards the margins between and overlap of localities and the special conditions created in these areas.

Figures 51-54, C. Mattheck.
Right to left:  
Growth a of tree around a railing
Finite element mesh, loads and restraints
Initial von Mises stress plot
Optimized design with stress plot

Figures 47-50, C. Mattheck.
Left to right:
Growth a of tree constricted by a rope.
Initial von Mises stress plot
Optimized design with von Mises stress plot


Exploration of mechanisms of phase shift/catastrophe
Taking example from the grid shell/diatom research of Frei Otto detailed above, this thesis will explore the convergence of conditions which precipitates phase shifts and catastrophes. The transition between localities, each governed by different singularity, will likely be the location of a phase shifting between patterns. These phase shifts may be seamless; however they may also contain unique morphologies which are not simply a blend between patterns (what Otto terms “net defects.”)

Konrad Wachsmann, Aircraft hanger

Materiality
This thesis will develop several interdependent, behaviorally distinct material systems in order to create a structure which is highly responsive to local edge conditions, lines of stress, and local methods of load transmission (i.e. via membrane stresses). Material systems will at a minimum include a system of components developed to carry tensile forces (steel or fiber-based components), a system which carries compressive forces and glazing components.

Figure 102. BX-58 Grid, 3-way Tetrahedron

Integrated tensile and compressive systems
Reinforcement meshes are typically placed along principle lines of stress. A net system of tension components must be capable of local densification, shifts in weave direction, and local unstitching and reorientation to accommodate apertures. Principle lines of compression run at right angles to principle lines of tension. Weaving together tension and compression meshes requires a contingent connective system at right angle intersections.

Figure 97,98. George Wimberly, Howard Cook Windward City Shopping Center, Elevation, roof plan, reinforcing plan

Above: Tension and compression component couple, with principle directionality perpendicular to one another
Middle:
Partial mesh oriented to principle lines of tensile stress (middle). Partial mesh oriented to principle lines of compressive stress (right).
Below: Principle lines of stress on a vault. Component based meshes following lines of principle tension (right) and compression (middle).

_________________

108 see Architectural Design: Versioning, vol.72, n.5, (2002 ), particularly Ingeborg Rocker, Versioning: evolving architectures, dissolving identities - ‘nothing is as persistent as change’, p.[10]-17 for a discussion of versioning.
109 M.P. Bendsøe, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark and A. R. Diaz S. Chellappa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, Design Optimization in a Multiscale Setting.

Figures 77-80. Top left to bottom right:
1, 2. E. Saarinnen, MIT Kresge auditorium 
3. E. Lamm, structurally optimized shell
4. Deformation plotted against self-weight, original and optimized design 

Saarinnen’s Kresge auditorium is a dome that is trimmed such that it rests on point supports rather than continuous edges. As Martin
Bechthold explains in Innovative surface structures: technologies and applications, this trimming created engineering difficulties that required undesirable design compromises. Removing segments of the dome created interruptions in the path of hoop forces, inducing bending moments that necessitated large edge beams. In plane shearing stresses developed at the junction between these edge beams and shell edges. These issues lead Saarinnen to add vertical supports in the glazed facades. E. Ramm later digitally modeled and analyzed the auditorium’s shell, optimizing its shape through FEA (finite element analysis) such that neither edge beams nor the added vertical support would be necessary. In this case, departing from primitive geometry by adding local curvature, it may be argued, rationalizes the structure.

___________

Bechthold, Martin. Innovative surface structures: technologies and applications. New York Taylor & Francis, 2008. 

Figures 83-85, E. Ramm.
Topology optimization of point loaded dome
Objective: Maximum stiffness
Constraint: Given mass
Top left to bottom right:
1. Loads and restraints
2-4. Optimized structure, reducing mass at each step


Figures 55-58, M. Xie. 
Initial design domain with loads and restraints
Optimized structure
Revised design domain (gap inserted in domain)
Revised optimized structure